Judge in Trump documents case weighs potential defense conflicts
- U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon set a hearing Oct. 12 to hear whether lawyers for Trump’s co-defendants have conflicts of interest with witnesses in the classified documents case.
The judge in Donald Trump’s criminal case alleging that classified documents were mishandled will weigh on Thursday whether lawyers for two co-defendants are too close to witnesses.
U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon will consider arguments related to witnesses expected to testify about the co-defendants moving boxes and trying to delete surveillance video at Mar-a-Lago. The testimony is part of the evidence against Trump and his co-defendants for allegedly retaining and hiding national security records after he left the White House.
Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith warned Cannon that lawyers representing Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, two staffers at Mar-a-Lago where the FBI seized the classified documents, might have conflicts.
Stanley Woodward represents Nauta, Trump’s personal valet. John Irving represents De Oliveira, the property manager at Mar-a-Lago. Woodward and Irving also represented several witnesses in the case.
Woodward told prosecutors he had no conflicts. Donnie Murrell, another lawyer for De Oliveira, said there was no conflict with witnesses and that even if there was, Murrell could cross-examine them rather than Irving.
Trump is charged with unlawful retention of national defense information. He is charged with Nauta and De Oliveira with obstruction of justice. All three have pleaded not guilty.
Here is a summary of potential conflicts prosecutors raised:
attorney John Irving, left, at the James Lawrence King Federal Justice Building, Monday, July 31, 2023, in Miami. De Oliveira, Mar-a-Lago’s property manager, was added last week to the indictment with Trump and the former president’s valet, Walt Nauta, in the federal case alleging a plot to illegally keep top-secret records at Trump’s Florida estate and thwart government efforts to retrieve them. (AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee)”/>
Defense lawyer might ‘pull his punches’ to protect witness: prosecutors
Woodward represented seven other people questioned during the investigation, including three likely witnesses at trial, prosecutors said.
Irving represented four other people questioned during the investigation, including three potential witnesses at trial, prosecutors said.
Prosecutors argued there could be two types of conflicts. One is that a lawyer could disclose confidences from his client during cross-examination of a witness. Another is that the attorney might “pull his punches” during cross-examination to protect his client’s confidences or because of his personal interests.
In De Oliveira’s case, according to prosecutors:
- One witness told Nauta that Trump wanted to talk to him before he abruptly changed plans and discussed deleting security video with another employee.
- Another witness could demonstrate the falseness of De Oliveira’s statements about what he was doing on the surveillance video.
- The third witness has information about Nauta and De Oliveira moving boxes at Mar-a-Lago.
Murrell, De Oliveira’s lawyer, said in a court filing that Irving no longer represents the three witnesses and that he has no confidential information about those witnesses that could be a conflict in cross-examination.
“Here, the Government seeks a hearing based on only what it believes is a potential for a conflict, and not any actual conflict,” Murrell wrote.
Witnesses could testify about attempts to delete surveillance video: prosecutors
In Nauta’s case, some of the rationale that explained why each witness could face a conflict was filed in confidential documents. According to prosecutors:
- The director of information technology at Mar-a-Lago, Yuscil Taveras, told investigators De Oliveira asked him to delete security camera footage.
- Another witness worked for Trump during his presidency and in Florida.
- Another witness worked for Trump’s reelection campaign and for his political action committee after he lost.
“All three may be witnesses for the Government at trial, raising the possibility that Mr. Woodward might be in the position of cross-examining past or current clients,” prosecutors wrote for Smith. The director of information technology changed lawyers before the grand jury handed up the indictment.
Woodward told prosecutors that he notified his various clients about potential conflicts, but doesn’t think there are any. Woodward said in a filing that he played no role in the grand jury testimony from Taveras, and the witness testified he “wasn’t coached.”
Cannon set the hearings at 1 p.m. for De Oliveira and 3 p.m. for Nauta.
Source link
Attorneys and law firms can elevate their online presence with professionally written content from SEO Content Writing Services monthly plan. Our team of experienced writers specializes in crafting blog posts, articles, and written content that accurately reflect the expertise and knowledge of our clients in the legal field. With a keen eye for detail and a thorough understanding of legal terminology, we provide high-quality writing that helps our clients stand out from their competition and engage with their target audience. Trust SEO Content Writing Services for one time article writing or monthly written content to handle all of your written content needs and showcase your law firm's expertise.
If you need written content, blog posts, or articles professionally written for your website, we can help. Go HERE to find out more.
or email us here: myseowritingservices@gmail.com
To find out more about our article writing or blog post services, fill out the form, thank you.
